Current:Home > MyLibertarian candidates for Congress will be left off Iowa ballots after final court decision-DB Wealth Institute B2 Expert Reviews
Libertarian candidates for Congress will be left off Iowa ballots after final court decision
View Date:2024-12-24 11:12:22
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Three Libertarian candidates running for Congress in Iowa will not be named on the ballot this November, the state Supreme Court said Wednesday, an outcome that could benefit Republicans in two competitive districts.
The high court offered a quick and final decision following Tuesday’s oral arguments, already more than a week after the deadline for state officials to certify the names of nominees before ballots can be printed.
Iowans affiliated with the Republican Party filed challenges against the three candidates, alleging that the Libertarian Party of Iowa failed to follow state law on the procedure for nominating their candidates. A three-member panel of state elected officials, comprised of two Republicans and one Democrat, ruled 2-1 in agreement with the challengers.
The Libertarian candidates filed a court challenge. A Polk County judge issued a decision Saturday saying the state objection panel’s decision was appropriate, and the candidates immediately appealed to the high court.
The Iowa Supreme Court on Wednesday affirmed the lower court’s decision.
Independent or third-party candidates usually have little chance of winning, but the question of how their margin of support could change the outcome of the race vexes Democratic and Republican leaders alike.
“In general, the parties are worried about minor parties that might take votes from them,” said Stephen Medvic, professor of government at Franklin & Marshall College. “It’s a pretty straightforward calculus. The Libertarian is more likely to take votes from the Republican.”
One of Iowa’s four congressional races was decided by a razor-thin margin in 2022. Republican Zach Nunn, who was challenging incumbent Democrat Cindy Axne, won by less than a percentage point. There was not a third-party candidate.
Nunn is facing a competitive race against Democrat Lanon Baccam in the 3rd Congressional District, as is incumbent Republican Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks against Democrat Christina Bohannan in the 1st District.
Representing the challengers, conservative attorney Alan Ostergren argued that the candidates were improperly nominated at the party’s convention because the delegates at the initial county conventions had not yet started their terms. State law says delegates start their terms the day after they are selected at precinct caucuses, but the Libertarian Party held county conventions the same day.
Secretary of State Paul Pate and Attorney General Brenna Bird, two Republicans on the state elections panel, agreed. The lone dissent on the panel came from State Auditor Rob Sand, a Democrat who accused his colleagues of political bias against the Libertarian candidates.
Before the Iowa Supreme Court, the state argued that enforcement of election law as written protects election integrity and transparency, and these laws ensure that the delegates actually have the authority to speak on behalf of voters and prevent conflicts that could promote more than one nominee.
Ostergren added that the laws may seem “harsh” when enforced, but they provide regularity in the process of gaining access to the ballot.
“If you want to be on the general election ballot and have every eligible Iowan who can participate in that election show up and decide you among other people, you got to follow those rules,” he said.
What to know about the 2024 Election
- Today’s news: Follow live updates from the campaign trail from the AP.
- Ground Game: Sign up for AP’s weekly politics newsletter to get it in your inbox every Monday.
- AP’s Role: The Associated Press is the most trusted source of information on election night, with a history of accuracy dating to 1848. Learn more.
Lawyers for the candidates argued that the technicality does not invalidate the selection of the candidates — undisputed within the party — and warrants an infraction on the organization, not the candidates’ removal from the ballot.
Ultimately, Libertarian nominees Nicholas Gluba in the 1st District, Marco Battaglia in the 3rd District and Charles Aldrich in the 4th District will not be named on the general election ballots.
Battaglia said after Tuesday’s hearing that the challenges were an “unfair attack” and that he’s done everything he could to make sure “things were done the right way.”
“I will stay in until the end of the race regardless. I plan to do that no matter what happened today or yesterday or tomorrow,” he said, saying he’d run a write-in campaign. “That’s the alternative they leave me with, but I’m fine with that, if that’s how they decide.”
veryGood! (82974)
Related
- Olivia Munn began randomly drug testing John Mulaney during her first pregnancy
- Tornado spotted in Rhode Island as thunderstorms move through New England
- Former Kentucky prosecutor indicted on federal bribery, fraud charges
- The British Museum fires employee for suspected theft of ancient treasures
- Stop What You're Doing—Moo Deng Just Dropped Her First Single
- UCLA coach Mick Cronin: Realignment not 'in the best interest of the student-athlete'
- QB Derek Carr is still ‘adjusting’ to New Orleans Saints, but he's feeling rejuvenated
- The Perfect Fall Sweater Is Only $32 and You’ll Want 1 in Every Color
- NBC's hospital sitcom 'St. Denis Medical' might heal you with laughter: Review
- 'Swamp Kings': Florida football docuseries rehashes Gators' era of success and swagger
Ranking
- Stock market today: Asian stocks decline as China stimulus plan disappoints markets
- Abuse, conspiracy charges ensnare 9 Northern California cops in massive FBI probe
- DonorsChoose sees banner donation year with help from Gates Foundation and millions of small gifts
- 'Motivated by insatiable greed': Miami real estate agent who used PPP funds on Bentley sentenced
- Appeals Court Affirms Conviction of Everglades Scientist Accused of Stealing ‘Trade Secrets’
- California’s Top Methane Emitter is a Vast Cattle Feedlot. For Now, Federal and State Greenhouse Gas Regulators Are Giving It a Pass.
- Patrick and Brittany Mahomes’ 8-Month-Old Son Bronze Rushed to Hospital After Allergic Reaction
- 'I want the WNBA to grow': Angel Reese calls for expansion teams to help incoming stars
Recommendation
-
Jennifer Garner and Boyfriend John Miller Are All Smiles In Rare Public Outing
-
FTC fines Experian for littering inboxes with spam, giving customers no way to unsubscribe
-
USWNT general manager Kate Markgraf parts ways with team after early World Cup exit
-
Indoor pollution can make you sick. Here's how to keep your home's air clean
-
NBA players express concern for ex-player Kyle Singler after social media post
-
Emerging economies are pushing to end the dollar’s dominance. But what’s the alternative?
-
American Airlines sues a travel site to crack down on consumers who use this trick to save money
-
Charlize Theron Has the Best Response to Rumors She’s Gotten Plastic Surgery
Like
- Why Kathy Bates Decided Against Reconstruction Surgery After Double Mastectomy for Breast Cancer
- After Israeli raids, Palestinian police struggle in militant hotbed, reflecting region on the brink
- A Texas Dairy Ranks Among the State’s Biggest Methane Emitters. But Don’t Ask the EPA or the State About It